Context and Data Preparation

Analysis Overview and Data Quality

OV

Analysis Overview

Product Profitability Configuration

Analysis overview and configuration

Product Profitability
Superstore Retail
Analyze product-level profitability to identify which products are most and least profitable, detect loss leaders, and optimize the product mix
Module Configuration
min_orders 5
margin_threshold 20
pareto_pct 80
time_granularity month
top_n_products 20
top_n_losers 10
Processing ID
test_1773213771
IN

Key Insights

Analysis Overview

Purpose

This analysis evaluates product-level profitability across a 1,089-product portfolio spanning 2014–2017, identifying which products drive profit concentration, which operate at losses, and how profitability varies by category and time. The objective is to optimize product mix by understanding margin distribution, loss leader exposure, and category performance.

Key Findings

  • Overall Margin: 13.17% across $1.67M revenue generating $219.6K profit—indicating thin margins typical of retail operations
  • Profit Concentration: Top 228 products (21%) generate 80% of profit; top single product (Canon copier) contributes $25.2K (11.5% of total profit)
  • Loss Leaders: 170 products (15.6%) operate at negative margins; 919 products (84.4%) are profitable
  • Category Performance: Technology leads with 22.67% avg margin and $106K profit; Furniture underperforms at 3.07% margin and $18.9K profit
  • Margin Distribution: 455 products cluster in 0–25% range; only 3 products exceed -50% loss threshold

Interpretation

The portfolio exhibits classic Pareto behavior: heavy reliance on a small profitable core subsidizes a large tail of marginal performers. Furniture’s weak profit

IN

Key Insights

Analysis Overview

Purpose

This analysis evaluates product-level profitability across a 1,089-product portfolio spanning 2014–2017, identifying which products drive profit concentration, which operate at losses, and how profitability varies by category and time. The objective is to optimize product mix by understanding margin distribution, loss leader exposure, and category performance.

Key Findings

  • Overall Margin: 13.17% across $1.67M revenue generating $219.6K profit—indicating thin margins typical of retail operations
  • Profit Concentration: Top 228 products (21%) generate 80% of profit; top single product (Canon copier) contributes $25.2K (11.5% of total profit)
  • Loss Leaders: 170 products (15.6%) operate at negative margins; 919 products (84.4%) are profitable
  • Category Performance: Technology leads with 22.67% avg margin and $106K profit; Furniture underperforms at 3.07% margin and $18.9K profit
  • Margin Distribution: 455 products cluster in 0–25% range; only 3 products exceed -50% loss threshold

Interpretation

The portfolio exhibits classic Pareto behavior: heavy reliance on a small profitable core subsidizes a large tail of marginal performers. Furniture’s weak profit

PP

Data Preprocessing

Data Quality & Completeness

9,994
Final Observations

Data preprocessing and column mapping

Data Pipeline
9,994
Initial Records
9,994
Clean Records
Column Mapping
product_name
Product Name
revenue
Sales
profit
Profit
quantity
Quantity
category
Category
sub_category
Sub-Category
order_date
Order Date
9,994 Records
MCP Analytics
IN

Key Insights

Data Preprocessing

Purpose

This section documents the data intake and cleaning phase for the product-level P&L analysis. A 100% retention rate indicates no rows were filtered or removed during preprocessing, meaning all 9,994 transaction records proceeded to analysis. This is critical for ensuring the profitability insights, Pareto analysis, and loss leader detection reflect the complete dataset without selection bias.

Key Findings

  • Retention Rate: 100% (9,994 rows retained) - No data loss occurred during preprocessing, preserving the full transaction population for analysis
  • Rows Removed: 0 - No filtering, deduplication, or outlier removal was applied to the dataset
  • Data Completeness: All 1,089 unique products and 9,994 transactions remained intact through the pipeline
  • Train/Test Split: Not applicable - This is a descriptive P&L analysis, not a predictive modeling exercise

Interpretation

The perfect retention rate suggests either exceptionally clean source data or minimal preprocessing rigor. For a P&L analysis spanning 1,089 products across three categories, this means all revenue, cost, and margin calculations include every transaction without exclusion. However, the absence of any data quality interventions (no outlier handling, no missing value treatment) raises questions about whether problematic records—such as negative revenues or extreme margin anomalies—were genuinely

IN

Key Insights

Data Preprocessing

Purpose

This section documents the data intake and cleaning phase for the product-level P&L analysis. A 100% retention rate indicates no rows were filtered or removed during preprocessing, meaning all 9,994 transaction records proceeded to analysis. This is critical for ensuring the profitability insights, Pareto analysis, and loss leader detection reflect the complete dataset without selection bias.

Key Findings

  • Retention Rate: 100% (9,994 rows retained) - No data loss occurred during preprocessing, preserving the full transaction population for analysis
  • Rows Removed: 0 - No filtering, deduplication, or outlier removal was applied to the dataset
  • Data Completeness: All 1,089 unique products and 9,994 transactions remained intact through the pipeline
  • Train/Test Split: Not applicable - This is a descriptive P&L analysis, not a predictive modeling exercise

Interpretation

The perfect retention rate suggests either exceptionally clean source data or minimal preprocessing rigor. For a P&L analysis spanning 1,089 products across three categories, this means all revenue, cost, and margin calculations include every transaction without exclusion. However, the absence of any data quality interventions (no outlier handling, no missing value treatment) raises questions about whether problematic records—such as negative revenues or extreme margin anomalies—were genuinely

Executive Summary

Key Findings and Recommendations

TLDR

Executive Summary

Key Findings & Recommendations

1667092
Overall Profit Margin

Key Performance Indicators

total^Sales | Sales | Sales$
1,667,092
total^Profit | Profit | Profit$
219,570.1
Overall margin pct
13.17
Product count
1,089
Loss leader count
170
Profitable product count
919
Pareto cutoff rank
228

Key Findings

Key findings

Metric Value
Total Revenue $1,667,092
Total Profit $219,570.1
Overall Margin 13.2%
Products Analyzed 1089
Profitable Products 919 (84.4%)
Loss Leaders 170 (15.6%)
Top Product Canon imageCLASS 2200 Advanced Copier ($25,199.93)
Pareto Vital Few Top 228 of 1089 (20.9%) drive 80% of Profit

Executive Summary

Bottom Line: Your 1089-product portfolio generated $219,570.1 in total Profit at a 13.2% overall margin from $1,667,092 in Sales. Strong Pareto concentration: top 228 products (20.9%) drive 80% of Profit. 170 products have negative margins (loss leaders).

Key Findings:
Vital Few: Focus marketing and inventory on the top 228 products that drive the majority of Profit
Top Performer: 'Canon imageCLASS 2200 Advanced Copier' generates $25,199.93 in Profit — protect and promote this winner
Urgent Fixes: 170 loss leaders are bleeding money — reprice or discontinue ASAP
Portfolio Health: 84.4% of products are profitable with positive margins

Recommendation: PRIORITY: Fix 170 loss leaders immediately to stop Profit leakage. Shift marketing budget to the vital few (228 products driving 80% of Profit) to maximize ROI. Consider discontinuing low-volume loss leaders that don't drive related sales. Potential Profit increase: Repricing loss leaders alone could swing thousands in annual Profit.

IN

Key Insights

Executive Summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Purpose

This section synthesizes the complete product-level P&L analysis to assess whether the portfolio is optimized for profitability. It answers the core business question: which products drive value, which drain it, and where should management focus resources to maximize return on the $1.67M sales base.

Key Findings

  • Overall Profitability: $219,570 profit on $1.67M revenue = 13.2% margin—modest but positive, indicating the portfolio is fundamentally viable
  • Pareto Concentration: Top 228 products (20.9% of portfolio) generate 80% of profit, confirming classic vital-few distribution
  • Loss Leader Burden: 170 products (15.6%) operate at negative margins, collectively destroying shareholder value
  • Portfolio Health: 919 of 1,089 products (84.4%) are profitable, suggesting selective rather than systemic pricing problems
  • Top Performer: Canon imageCLASS 2200 generates $25,200 profit alone—11.5% of total portfolio profit from one SKU

Interpretation

The analysis confirms the business objective was achieved: clear identification of profit drivers, loss leaders, and margin distribution. The portfolio exhibits healthy Pareto structure—concentrated profit in a manageable subset—but is handicapped by 170

IN

Key Insights

Executive Summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Purpose

This section synthesizes the complete product-level P&L analysis to assess whether the portfolio is optimized for profitability. It answers the core business question: which products drive value, which drain it, and where should management focus resources to maximize return on the $1.67M sales base.

Key Findings

  • Overall Profitability: $219,570 profit on $1.67M revenue = 13.2% margin—modest but positive, indicating the portfolio is fundamentally viable
  • Pareto Concentration: Top 228 products (20.9% of portfolio) generate 80% of profit, confirming classic vital-few distribution
  • Loss Leader Burden: 170 products (15.6%) operate at negative margins, collectively destroying shareholder value
  • Portfolio Health: 919 of 1,089 products (84.4%) are profitable, suggesting selective rather than systemic pricing problems
  • Top Performer: Canon imageCLASS 2200 generates $25,200 profit alone—11.5% of total portfolio profit from one SKU

Interpretation

The analysis confirms the business objective was achieved: clear identification of profit drivers, loss leaders, and margin distribution. The portfolio exhibits healthy Pareto structure—concentrated profit in a manageable subset—but is handicapped by 170

Top Profitable Products

Top 20 Products by Total Profit with Revenue Comparison

TP

Top Profitable Products

Top 20 Products by Total Profit

Top 20 most profitable products ranked by total Profit

IN

Key Insights

Top Profitable Products

Purpose

This section identifies the 20 most profitable products by absolute profit contribution, revealing which items drive the greatest financial value to the business. Understanding profit leaders is essential for P&L analysis, as it shows which products justify inventory investment and marketing focus despite varying revenue and margin profiles.

Key Findings

  • Top Performer: Canon imageCLASS 2200 Advanced Copier generates $25,199.93 profit (40.91% margin) on $61,599.82 revenue—accounting for ~11.5% of total company profit from a single product
  • Profit Concentration: Top 5 products contribute $46,880.14 in profit, representing ~21% of total company profit despite being only 0.5% of the product portfolio
  • Margin Variance: Top 20 products average 27.74% margin (mean), significantly above the overall 13.17% company margin, indicating elite profitability
  • Revenue-Profit Disconnect: Apple iPhone 5 ranks 20th in profit ($1,611.58) despite $12,996.60 revenue, showing 12.4% margin—demonstrating that high sales don’t guarantee strong profit contribution

Interpretation

The top 20 products represent a highly profitable segment where both volume and margin align favorably. The Canon copier exemplifies this—

IN

Key Insights

Top Profitable Products

Purpose

This section identifies the 20 most profitable products by absolute profit contribution, revealing which items drive the greatest financial value to the business. Understanding profit leaders is essential for P&L analysis, as it shows which products justify inventory investment and marketing focus despite varying revenue and margin profiles.

Key Findings

  • Top Performer: Canon imageCLASS 2200 Advanced Copier generates $25,199.93 profit (40.91% margin) on $61,599.82 revenue—accounting for ~11.5% of total company profit from a single product
  • Profit Concentration: Top 5 products contribute $46,880.14 in profit, representing ~21% of total company profit despite being only 0.5% of the product portfolio
  • Margin Variance: Top 20 products average 27.74% margin (mean), significantly above the overall 13.17% company margin, indicating elite profitability
  • Revenue-Profit Disconnect: Apple iPhone 5 ranks 20th in profit ($1,611.58) despite $12,996.60 revenue, showing 12.4% margin—demonstrating that high sales don’t guarantee strong profit contribution

Interpretation

The top 20 products represent a highly profitable segment where both volume and margin align favorably. The Canon copier exemplifies this—

Pareto Analysis

Concentration of Profit in Vital Few Products

PA

Pareto Analysis

Cumulative Profit Concentration (80/20 Rule)

Pareto principle: percentage of products driving 80% of total Profit

IN

Key Insights

Pareto Analysis

Purpose

This section applies the Pareto principle to identify which products are profit drivers. By ranking all 1,089 products by profitability and calculating cumulative profit contribution, it reveals the concentration of profit generation. Understanding this distribution is critical for portfolio management and resource allocation in the P&L analysis.

Key Findings

  • Pareto Cutoff Rank: 228 products (20.9% of portfolio) - These vital few products generate 80% of total profit
  • Profit Concentration: The top product alone contributes $25,199.93, while the median product contributes only $59.57, indicating extreme skewness
  • Tail Risk: 170 loss-leader products generate negative profit, dragging overall margin to 13.17%
  • Steep Initial Curve: The cumulative profit percentage climbs rapidly through the first 228 products, then plateaus, confirming classic Pareto distribution

Interpretation

The data demonstrates severe profit concentration typical of product portfolios. Just one-fifth of products account for four-fifths of profit, while the remaining 861 products contribute minimally or negatively. This pattern reflects the reality that high-value items (copiers, binding machines, accessories) drive profitability, whereas commodity office supplies and furniture generate thin or negative margins. The presence of 170 loss leaders suggests strategic

IN

Key Insights

Pareto Analysis

Purpose

This section applies the Pareto principle to identify which products are profit drivers. By ranking all 1,089 products by profitability and calculating cumulative profit contribution, it reveals the concentration of profit generation. Understanding this distribution is critical for portfolio management and resource allocation in the P&L analysis.

Key Findings

  • Pareto Cutoff Rank: 228 products (20.9% of portfolio) - These vital few products generate 80% of total profit
  • Profit Concentration: The top product alone contributes $25,199.93, while the median product contributes only $59.57, indicating extreme skewness
  • Tail Risk: 170 loss-leader products generate negative profit, dragging overall margin to 13.17%
  • Steep Initial Curve: The cumulative profit percentage climbs rapidly through the first 228 products, then plateaus, confirming classic Pareto distribution

Interpretation

The data demonstrates severe profit concentration typical of product portfolios. Just one-fifth of products account for four-fifths of profit, while the remaining 861 products contribute minimally or negatively. This pattern reflects the reality that high-value items (copiers, binding machines, accessories) drive profitability, whereas commodity office supplies and furniture generate thin or negative margins. The presence of 170 loss leaders suggests strategic

Margin Distribution

Portfolio Health and Margin Spread

MD

Margin Distribution

Product Count by Profit Margin Range

Distribution of Profit margins across all products

IN

Key Insights

Margin Distribution

Purpose

This section visualizes how profit margins are distributed across the 1,089-product portfolio, revealing the health of pricing strategy and cost control. Understanding margin distribution is critical for the P&L analysis objective, as it identifies whether profitability is concentrated in a few products or broadly distributed, and quantifies the extent of loss-leader activity.

Key Findings

  • Positive Margin Products: 919 products (84.4%) generate profit, indicating a fundamentally healthy portfolio structure
  • Loss-Leader Products: 170 products (15.6%) operate at negative margins, representing deliberate or unintended margin erosion
  • Dominant Cluster: 464 products (42.6%) fall in the 25–50% margin bin, showing strong concentration in the profitable range
  • Negative Margin Concentration: 170 loss leaders are distributed across three bins (<−50%, −50 to −25%, −25 to 0%), with 148 products in the −25 to 0% range

Interpretation

The right-skewed distribution—with the largest product cluster in positive margins and zero products exceeding 50% margins—reflects a portfolio optimized for steady profitability rather than premium pricing. The 15.6% loss-leader rate is material but manageable, suggesting these products may serve strategic purposes (customer acquisition, bundling

IN

Key Insights

Margin Distribution

Purpose

This section visualizes how profit margins are distributed across the 1,089-product portfolio, revealing the health of pricing strategy and cost control. Understanding margin distribution is critical for the P&L analysis objective, as it identifies whether profitability is concentrated in a few products or broadly distributed, and quantifies the extent of loss-leader activity.

Key Findings

  • Positive Margin Products: 919 products (84.4%) generate profit, indicating a fundamentally healthy portfolio structure
  • Loss-Leader Products: 170 products (15.6%) operate at negative margins, representing deliberate or unintended margin erosion
  • Dominant Cluster: 464 products (42.6%) fall in the 25–50% margin bin, showing strong concentration in the profitable range
  • Negative Margin Concentration: 170 loss leaders are distributed across three bins (<−50%, −50 to −25%, −25 to 0%), with 148 products in the −25 to 0% range

Interpretation

The right-skewed distribution—with the largest product cluster in positive margins and zero products exceeding 50% margins—reflects a portfolio optimized for steady profitability rather than premium pricing. The 15.6% loss-leader rate is material but manageable, suggesting these products may serve strategic purposes (customer acquisition, bundling

Loss Leaders

Products with Negative Margins Requiring Action

LL

Loss Leaders

Bottom 10 Products with Negative Margins

Bottom 10 loss leaders with negative Profit margins that need repricing or discontinuation

IN

Key Insights

Loss Leaders

Purpose

This section identifies the 10 most severe loss leaders—products with deeply negative profit margins that are actively eroding overall portfolio profitability. Loss leaders represent 15.6% of the 1,089-product portfolio (170 products), and understanding their severity and volume is critical for pricing strategy and product viability decisions within the P&L analysis framework.

Key Findings

  • Margin Range: -99.33% to -38.27% (mean: -51.56%) — extreme negative margins indicating costs far exceed selling prices
  • Total Loss Concentration: Top 10 loss leaders collectively lose ~$688 across modest revenue (~$1,559), demonstrating profitability drain despite low sales volume
  • Order Frequency: 5–9 orders per product (mean: 7.3) — consistent but unprofitable demand, suggesting systematic pricing misalignment rather than isolated transactions
  • Revenue Paradox: Premier Elliptical Ring Binder generates $526.61 revenue yet loses $201.51, while GBC Plasticlear Covers loses $68.42 on just $68.88 revenue—both unsustainable

Interpretation

These loss leaders represent a structural pricing problem: customers are purchasing at prices below cost. The consistent order frequency (5–9 per product) indicates these aren’t anomalies

IN

Key Insights

Loss Leaders

Purpose

This section identifies the 10 most severe loss leaders—products with deeply negative profit margins that are actively eroding overall portfolio profitability. Loss leaders represent 15.6% of the 1,089-product portfolio (170 products), and understanding their severity and volume is critical for pricing strategy and product viability decisions within the P&L analysis framework.

Key Findings

  • Margin Range: -99.33% to -38.27% (mean: -51.56%) — extreme negative margins indicating costs far exceed selling prices
  • Total Loss Concentration: Top 10 loss leaders collectively lose ~$688 across modest revenue (~$1,559), demonstrating profitability drain despite low sales volume
  • Order Frequency: 5–9 orders per product (mean: 7.3) — consistent but unprofitable demand, suggesting systematic pricing misalignment rather than isolated transactions
  • Revenue Paradox: Premier Elliptical Ring Binder generates $526.61 revenue yet loses $201.51, while GBC Plasticlear Covers loses $68.42 on just $68.88 revenue—both unsustainable

Interpretation

These loss leaders represent a structural pricing problem: customers are purchasing at prices below cost. The consistent order frequency (5–9 per product) indicates these aren’t anomalies

Category Comparison

Profitability Across Product Categories

CC

Category Comparison

Profitability by Product Category

Profitability comparison across product categories

IN

Key Insights

Category Comparison

Purpose

This section evaluates profitability performance across the three product categories to identify which segments drive overall business profit and margin performance. Understanding category-level profitability is essential for resource allocation decisions and identifying which product lines merit strategic focus within the broader P&L analysis.

Key Findings

  • Technology Category: $106,089 total profit (48% of portfolio) with 22.67% average margin across 188 products—highest profitability despite smallest product count
  • Office Supplies Category: $94,566 total profit (43% of portfolio) with 16.21% average margin across 658 products—largest product base with solid margin performance
  • Furniture Category: $18,915 total profit (9% of portfolio) with 3.07% average margin across 243 products—significantly underperforming on both margin and absolute profit
  • Efficiency Gap: Technology generates 56% more profit than Furniture while managing 23% fewer products, indicating vastly different unit economics

Interpretation

The data reveals a stark efficiency divide: Technology products deliver premium margins (22.67%) on a lean portfolio, while Furniture struggles with near-breakeven margins (3.07%) despite substantial product volume. Office Supplies occupies the middle ground, balancing scale (658 products) with respectable margins (16.21%). This pattern suggests Technology products

IN

Key Insights

Category Comparison

Purpose

This section evaluates profitability performance across the three product categories to identify which segments drive overall business profit and margin performance. Understanding category-level profitability is essential for resource allocation decisions and identifying which product lines merit strategic focus within the broader P&L analysis.

Key Findings

  • Technology Category: $106,089 total profit (48% of portfolio) with 22.67% average margin across 188 products—highest profitability despite smallest product count
  • Office Supplies Category: $94,566 total profit (43% of portfolio) with 16.21% average margin across 658 products—largest product base with solid margin performance
  • Furniture Category: $18,915 total profit (9% of portfolio) with 3.07% average margin across 243 products—significantly underperforming on both margin and absolute profit
  • Efficiency Gap: Technology generates 56% more profit than Furniture while managing 23% fewer products, indicating vastly different unit economics

Interpretation

The data reveals a stark efficiency divide: Technology products deliver premium margins (22.67%) on a lean portfolio, while Furniture struggles with near-breakeven margins (3.07%) despite substantial product volume. Office Supplies occupies the middle ground, balancing scale (658 products) with respectable margins (16.21%). This pattern suggests Technology products

Sub-Category Comparison

Profitability Across Product Sub-Categories

SC

Sub-Category Comparison

Profitability by Product Sub-Category

Profitability comparison across product sub-categories

IN

Key Insights

Sub-Category Comparison

Purpose

This section reveals profitability performance across 17 product sub-categories, providing granular insight beyond top-level category analysis. Understanding sub-category margins helps identify which specific product types drive the overall 13.17% portfolio margin and which are underperforming, enabling targeted optimization of product mix and pricing strategy.

Key Findings

  • Copiers: $43,223.54 profit (37.3% margin) across 8 products—highest absolute and relative profitability
  • Paper: $26,833.52 profit with 43.52% margin—strongest margin despite lower absolute profit than Copiers
  • Tables: -$12,475.83 loss (−7.62% margin) across 36 products—largest drag on portfolio profitability
  • Margin Disparity: Range spans 51 percentage points (−7.62% to 43.52%), indicating significant structural differences in sub-category economics
  • Scale Mismatch: Binders (170 products, 14.02% margin) generate less profit than Copiers (8 products, 37.3% margin), suggesting volume doesn’t compensate for margin weakness

Interpretation

Sub-categories exhibit stark profitability divergence. High-margin sub-categories (Paper, Copiers, Fasteners) operate with fundament

IN

Key Insights

Sub-Category Comparison

Purpose

This section reveals profitability performance across 17 product sub-categories, providing granular insight beyond top-level category analysis. Understanding sub-category margins helps identify which specific product types drive the overall 13.17% portfolio margin and which are underperforming, enabling targeted optimization of product mix and pricing strategy.

Key Findings

  • Copiers: $43,223.54 profit (37.3% margin) across 8 products—highest absolute and relative profitability
  • Paper: $26,833.52 profit with 43.52% margin—strongest margin despite lower absolute profit than Copiers
  • Tables: -$12,475.83 loss (−7.62% margin) across 36 products—largest drag on portfolio profitability
  • Margin Disparity: Range spans 51 percentage points (−7.62% to 43.52%), indicating significant structural differences in sub-category economics
  • Scale Mismatch: Binders (170 products, 14.02% margin) generate less profit than Copiers (8 products, 37.3% margin), suggesting volume doesn’t compensate for margin weakness

Interpretation

Sub-categories exhibit stark profitability divergence. High-margin sub-categories (Paper, Copiers, Fasteners) operate with fundament

Profit Trends

Monthly Profit Evolution by Category

PT

Profit Trends

Monthly Profit by Top Categories

Monthly Profit trends over time by top categories

IN

Key Insights

Profit Trends

Purpose

This section tracks how profitability and margins have evolved across product categories from 2014–2017, revealing whether the business is experiencing margin improvement or erosion. Understanding these trends is critical for identifying cost pressures, pricing effectiveness, and seasonal patterns that inform forecasting and strategic decisions.

Key Findings

  • Monthly Profit Range: $-3,014 to $11,708 across all categories, with mean of $1,989 and high variability (SD: $2,385)
  • Margin Volatility: Monthly margins span -25.67% to +37.13%, indicating significant fluctuation rather than stable improvement
  • Category Distribution: Three categories tracked over 48 months (4 years), with 16 observations per category
  • Trend Pattern: Late 2017 Technology data shows stronger margins (15–25%), suggesting recent improvement in that segment

Interpretation

The data reveals inconsistent profitability trends across the analysis period. While Technology shows recent strength in Q4 2017 with margins reaching 23–25%, the overall volatility (negative margins in early periods, wide swings) suggests margin erosion has been a persistent challenge. The high standard deviation relative to mean profit indicates seasonal or operational factors significantly impact monthly performance, making year-over-year comparison essential for distinguishing true improvement from cyclical patterns.

Context

IN

Key Insights

Profit Trends

Purpose

This section tracks how profitability and margins have evolved across product categories from 2014–2017, revealing whether the business is experiencing margin improvement or erosion. Understanding these trends is critical for identifying cost pressures, pricing effectiveness, and seasonal patterns that inform forecasting and strategic decisions.

Key Findings

  • Monthly Profit Range: $-3,014 to $11,708 across all categories, with mean of $1,989 and high variability (SD: $2,385)
  • Margin Volatility: Monthly margins span -25.67% to +37.13%, indicating significant fluctuation rather than stable improvement
  • Category Distribution: Three categories tracked over 48 months (4 years), with 16 observations per category
  • Trend Pattern: Late 2017 Technology data shows stronger margins (15–25%), suggesting recent improvement in that segment

Interpretation

The data reveals inconsistent profitability trends across the analysis period. While Technology shows recent strength in Q4 2017 with margins reaching 23–25%, the overall volatility (negative margins in early periods, wide swings) suggests margin erosion has been a persistent challenge. The high standard deviation relative to mean profit indicates seasonal or operational factors significantly impact monthly performance, making year-over-year comparison essential for distinguishing true improvement from cyclical patterns.

Context

Product P&L Table

Complete Financial Detail for All Products

T

Product P&L Table

Complete Product-Level Financial Detail

1089
Products Listed

Complete product-level P&L table with Sales, cost, Profit, and margin metrics

Product Name Category total_revenue total_cost total_profit profit_margin_pct order_count profit_rank
Canon imageCLASS 2200 Advanced Copier Technology 61599.824 36399.896 25199.928 40.910 5.000 1.000
Fellowes PB500 Electric Punch Plastic Comb Binding Machine with Manual Bind Office Supplies 27453.384 19700.345 7753.039 28.240 10.000 2.000
Hewlett Packard LaserJet 3310 Copier Technology 18839.686 11855.802 6983.884 37.070 8.000 3.000
Plantronics Savi W720 Multi-Device Wireless Headset System Technology 9367.290 5671.008 3696.282 39.460 7.000 4.000
Honeywell Enviracaire Portable HEPA Air Cleaner for 17' x 22' Room Office Supplies 11304.440 8057.420 3247.020 28.720 8.000 5.000
Hewlett Packard 610 Color Digital Copier / Printer Technology 8899.822 5774.885 3124.938 35.110 7.000 6.000
Plantronics CS510 - Over-the-Head monaural Wireless Headset System Technology 10822.360 7737.328 3085.032 28.510 10.000 7.000
Canon Imageclass D680 Copier / Fax Technology 8959.872 6159.912 2799.960 31.250 5.000 8.000
Fellowes PB300 Plastic Comb Binding Machine Office Supplies 8070.192 5552.137 2518.055 31.200 6.000 9.000
Ibico Ibimaster 300 Manual Binding System Office Supplies 7985.383 5667.046 2318.337 29.030 8.000 10.000
GBC DocuBind TL300 Electric Binding System Office Supplies 19823.479 17589.974 2233.505 11.270 11.000 11.000
Razer Tiamat Over Ear 7.1 Surround Sound PC Gaming Headset Technology 5119.744 2963.852 2155.892 42.110 7.000 12.000
Hot File 7-Pocket, Floor Stand Office Supplies 8138.232 6121.521 2016.711 24.780 13.000 13.000
Adjustable Depth Letter/Legal Cart Office Supplies 7730.196 5797.647 1932.549 25.000 12.000 14.000
Hon Deluxe Fabric Upholstered Stacking Chairs, Rounded Back Furniture 10637.528 8710.086 1927.442 18.120 12.000 15.000
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 Technology 13943.668 12120.911 1822.757 13.070 6.000 16.000
Sharp 1540cs Digital Laser Copier Technology 4399.920 2749.950 1649.970 37.500 7.000 17.000
Logitech P710e Mobile Speakerphone Technology 10196.604 8551.243 1645.361 16.140 9.000 18.000
Dual Level, Single-Width Filing Carts Office Supplies 6574.544 4934.009 1640.535 24.950 9.000 19.000
Apple iPhone 5 Technology 12996.600 11385.022 1611.578 12.400 6.000 20.000
GBC DocuBind TL200 Manual Binding Machine Office Supplies 4322.814 2730.316 1592.498 36.840 6.000 21.000
Tennsco 6- and 18-Compartment Lockers Office Supplies 10925.004 9349.894 1575.110 14.420 11.000 22.000
Global Deluxe High-Back Manager's Chair Furniture 8665.194 7106.603 1558.591 17.990 8.000 23.000
Dot Matrix Printer Tape Reel Labels, White, 5000/Box Office Supplies 3322.878 1804.972 1517.906 45.680 8.000 24.000
Canon PC-428 Personal Copier Technology 4119.794 2649.867 1469.927 35.680 6.000 25.000
Logitech diNovo Edge Keyboard Technology 7399.704 5967.261 1432.443 19.360 5.000 26.000
Hon 4070 Series Pagoda Armless Upholstered Stacking Chairs Furniture 8430.997 7042.362 1388.635 16.470 8.000 27.000
Iceberg Mobile Mega Data/Printer Cart Office Supplies 5751.774 4363.166 1388.608 24.140 8.000 28.000
Deluxe Rollaway Locking File with Drawer Office Supplies 5572.792 4192.070 1380.722 24.780 5.000 29.000
Office Star - Professional Matrix Back Chair with 2-to-1 Synchro Tilt and Mesh Fabric Seat Furniture 8774.500 7468.854 1305.646 14.880 8.000 30.000
Xerox 1915 Office Supplies 2789.010 1526.616 1262.394 45.260 9.000 31.000
Standard Rollaway File with Lock Office Supplies 6594.954 5333.624 1261.330 19.130 10.000 32.000
GE 48" Fluorescent Tube, Cool White Energy Saver, 34 Watts, 30/Box Furniture 2699.056 1438.835 1260.221 46.690 8.000 33.000
Letter Size Cart Office Supplies 4600.092 3347.210 1252.882 27.240 8.000 34.000
Hon GuestStacker Chair Furniture 6936.102 5703.017 1233.085 17.780 9.000 35.000
SAFCO Arco Folding Chair Furniture 11572.780 10393.406 1179.374 10.190 13.000 36.000
Panasonic KX-TG9471B Technology 4978.146 3810.046 1168.100 23.460 7.000 37.000
Brother DCP1000 Digital 3 in 1 Multifunction Machine Technology 4859.838 3704.876 1154.961 23.770 7.000 38.000
Panasonic KX-TG9541B DECT 6.0 Digital 2-Line Expandable Cordless Phone With Digital Answering System Technology 3059.796 1912.372 1147.424 37.500 5.000 39.000
Tennsco 16-Compartment Lockers with Coat Rack Office Supplies 7515.524 6401.153 1114.371 14.830 5.000 40.000
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini Technology 6109.870 5005.394 1104.476 18.080 5.000 41.000
Easy-staple paper Office Supplies 2504.192 1408.163 1096.029 43.770 46.000 42.000
Ibico EB-19 Dual Function Manual Binding System Office Supplies 3234.913 2148.536 1086.377 33.580 8.000 43.000
Hon 4070 Series Pagoda Round Back Stacking Chairs Furniture 5906.032 4853.218 1052.814 17.830 7.000 44.000
Wilson SignalBoost 841262 DB PRO Amplifier Kit Technology 5327.260 4283.405 1043.855 19.590 6.000 45.000
Razer Kraken 7.1 Surround Sound Over Ear USB Gaming Headset Technology 2619.738 1623.838 995.900 38.020 6.000 46.000
Lifetime Advantage Folding Chairs, 4/Carton Furniture 5212.112 4239.475 972.637 18.660 7.000 47.000
Bose SoundLink Bluetooth Speaker Technology 2865.600 1898.460 967.140 33.750 5.000 48.000
Global Troy Executive Leather Low-Back Tilter Furniture 12975.382 12023.520 951.862 7.340 9.000 49.000
Nortel Meridian M3904 Professional Digital phone Technology 4434.912 3498.653 936.259 21.110 10.000 50.000
Global Commerce Series High-Back Swivel/Tilt Chairs Furniture 7979.440 7053.255 926.185 11.610 9.000 51.000
Cisco SPA301 Technology 4180.532 3275.790 904.742 21.640 9.000 52.000
Polycom VVX 310 VoIP phone Technology 6227.654 5327.704 899.950 14.450 8.000 53.000
Logitech G700s Rechargeable Gaming Mouse Technology 2339.766 1449.855 889.911 38.030 9.000 54.000
Safco Contoured Stacking Chairs Furniture 5697.760 4827.600 870.160 15.270 8.000 55.000
Global Leather and Oak Executive Chair, Black Furniture 6410.874 5556.091 854.783 13.330 8.000 56.000
Multicolor Computer Printout Paper Office Supplies 1887.300 1035.918 851.382 45.110 5.000 57.000
Hewlett Packard 310 Color Digital Copier Technology 4199.860 3359.888 839.972 20.000 6.000 58.000
GE 30524EE4 Technology 5291.730 4452.893 838.837 15.850 9.000 59.000
Hon Olson Stacker Stools Furniture 5294.456 4460.861 833.595 15.740 10.000 60.000
Hon 4700 Series Mobuis Mid-Back Task Chairs with Adjustable Arms Furniture 7582.374 6749.381 832.993 10.990 6.000 61.000
Hon Multipurpose Stacking Arm Chairs Furniture 6584.640 5770.224 814.416 12.370 6.000 62.000
Xerox 1908 Office Supplies 1712.988 913.594 799.394 46.670 7.000 63.000
Global Ergonomic Managers Chair Furniture 6008.536 5223.083 785.453 13.070 11.000 64.000
Mitel MiVoice 5330e IP Phone Technology 7699.720 6918.748 780.972 10.140 9.000 65.000
Atlantic Metals Mobile 3-Shelf Bookcases, Custom Colors Furniture 7539.712 6759.382 780.330 10.350 8.000 66.000
GuestStacker Chair with Chrome Finish Legs Furniture 9070.944 8297.683 773.261 8.520 8.000 67.000
Logitech Wireless Gaming Headset G930 Technology 2879.820 2116.668 763.152 26.500 6.000 68.000
GBC Ibimaster 500 Manual ProClick Binding System Office Supplies 19024.500 18263.520 760.980 4.000 9.000 69.000
Xerox 1945 Office Supplies 1696.986 940.721 756.265 44.570 8.000 70.000
Plantronics S12 Corded Telephone Headset System Technology 2242.032 1487.502 754.530 33.650 6.000 71.000
Staple envelope Office Supplies 1686.812 935.183 751.629 44.560 48.000 72.000
Global Executive Mid-Back Manager's Chair Furniture 4626.582 3875.854 750.728 16.230 6.000 73.000
Xerox 189 Office Supplies 1782.450 1035.918 746.532 41.880 6.000 74.000
Wireless Extenders zBoost YX545 SOHO Signal Booster Technology 4044.386 3311.105 733.281 18.130 7.000 75.000
Xerox 1919 Office Supplies 1565.818 836.196 729.622 46.600 9.000 76.000
Logitech G19 Programmable Gaming Keyboard Technology 4389.246 3660.185 729.061 16.610 8.000 77.000
NETGEAR AC1750 Dual Band Gigabit Smart WiFi Router Technology 2623.836 1900.681 723.155 27.560 5.000 78.000
Enermax Aurora Lite Keyboard Technology 1641.150 919.044 722.106 44.000 5.000 79.000
Logitech Wireless Headset h800 Technology 2799.720 2079.792 719.928 25.710 6.000 80.000
Hoover Shoulder Vac Commercial Portable Vacuum Office Supplies 5009.480 4293.840 715.640 14.290 6.000 81.000
Google Nexus 5 Technology 3815.788 3104.827 710.961 18.630 5.000 82.000
Xerox 1941 Office Supplies 1740.510 1035.918 704.592 40.480 5.000 83.000
Global Leather Executive Chair Furniture 5861.533 5159.553 701.980 11.980 7.000 84.000
Logitech G35 7.1-Channel Surround Sound Headset Technology 2157.834 1458.488 699.346 32.410 6.000 85.000
Global Comet Stacking Arm Chair Furniture 6084.144 5387.002 697.141 11.460 5.000 86.000
Economy Rollaway Files Office Supplies 3138.800 2444.960 693.840 22.110 7.000 87.000
Fellowes PB200 Plastic Comb Binding Machine Office Supplies 4181.754 3488.195 693.559 16.590 9.000 88.000
Logitech Gaming G510s - Keyboard Technology 2362.722 1686.202 676.520 28.630 8.000 89.000
Jabra SPEAK 410 Technology 3158.064 2503.894 654.170 20.710 9.000 90.000
Microsoft Sculpt Comfort Mouse Technology 1574.030 939.624 634.406 40.300 10.000 91.000
Cameo Buff Policy Envelopes Office Supplies 1555.750 923.493 632.257 40.640 8.000 92.000
Enermax Acrylux Wireless Keyboard Technology 2450.160 1819.692 630.468 25.730 6.000 93.000
Electrix Architect's Clamp-On Swing Arm Lamp, Black Furniture 2863.800 2236.628 627.172 21.900 5.000 94.000
NETGEAR N750 Dual Band Wi-Fi Gigabit Router Technology 1890.000 1267.200 622.800 32.950 7.000 95.000
Xerox 1893 Office Supplies 1434.650 815.291 619.359 43.170 11.000 96.000
SAFCO PlanMaster Heigh-Adjustable Drafting Table Base, 43w x 30d x 30-37h, Black Furniture 3739.115 3131.072 608.043 16.260 5.000 97.000
1.7 Cubic Foot Compact "Cube" Office Refrigerators Office Supplies 2706.080 2127.395 578.685 21.380 6.000 98.000
Pyle PMP37LED Technology 3590.026 3013.126 576.900 16.070 10.000 99.000
Aastra 57i VoIP phone Technology 3684.708 3109.376 575.332 15.610 7.000 100.000
IN

Key Insights

Product P&L Table

Purpose

This section provides a complete product-level Profit & Loss statement for all 1,089 products meeting the minimum 5-order threshold. It serves as the foundational detail layer supporting the overall P&L analysis, enabling drill-down investigation into individual product economics, cost structures, and margin performance across the portfolio.

Key Findings

  • Total Portfolio: 1,089 products generating $1.67M revenue, $219.6K profit at 13.17% overall margin
  • Profitability Distribution: 919 profitable products (84.4%) vs. 170 loss leaders (15.6%), with profits ranging from -$2,876 to +$25,200
  • Margin Concentration: 455 products (41.7%) cluster in the 0–25% margin band; 148 products (13.6%) operate at negative margins
  • Top Performer: Canon imageCLASS 2200 Advanced Copier dominates with $25.2K profit on $61.6K revenue (40.91% margin)

Interpretation

The product-level detail reveals significant margin heterogeneity within the portfolio. While the overall 13.17% margin masks strong performers (Technology category at 22.67% avg margin), it also conceals structural profitability challenges in Furniture (-7.

IN

Key Insights

Product P&L Table

Purpose

This section provides a complete product-level Profit & Loss statement for all 1,089 products meeting the minimum 5-order threshold. It serves as the foundational detail layer supporting the overall P&L analysis, enabling drill-down investigation into individual product economics, cost structures, and margin performance across the portfolio.

Key Findings

  • Total Portfolio: 1,089 products generating $1.67M revenue, $219.6K profit at 13.17% overall margin
  • Profitability Distribution: 919 profitable products (84.4%) vs. 170 loss leaders (15.6%), with profits ranging from -$2,876 to +$25,200
  • Margin Concentration: 455 products (41.7%) cluster in the 0–25% margin band; 148 products (13.6%) operate at negative margins
  • Top Performer: Canon imageCLASS 2200 Advanced Copier dominates with $25.2K profit on $61.6K revenue (40.91% margin)

Interpretation

The product-level detail reveals significant margin heterogeneity within the portfolio. While the overall 13.17% margin masks strong performers (Technology category at 22.67% avg margin), it also conceals structural profitability challenges in Furniture (-7.